<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bob Hayes Online &#187; Hollywood</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bobhayesonline.com/category/hollywood/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bobhayesonline.com</link>
	<description>Web Content, Writing, Business Consulting</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:09:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Man Up, You Punks</title>
		<link>http://bobhayesonline.com/2008/02/19/man-up-you-punks/</link>
		<comments>http://bobhayesonline.com/2008/02/19/man-up-you-punks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 15:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Hayes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Culture Crisis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Human Future]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bobhayes.net/2008/02/19/man-up-you-punks/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, he says it nicer.
Not unrelated.
(H/T Evangelical Outpost.)
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, he says it <a href="http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/opinion/columnists/rdreher/stories/012708dnedidreher.62f77f11.html">nicer</a>.</p>
<p>Not <a href="http://www.resurrectionsong.com/index.php/weblog/three_sunday_reviews_part_1_love/">unrelated</a>.</p>
<p>(H/T <a href="http://www.evangelicaloutpost.com/archives/004228.html">Evangelical Outpost</a>.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bobhayesonline.com/2008/02/19/man-up-you-punks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tom Cruise&#8217;s Scarily Funny Doppelganger</title>
		<link>http://bobhayesonline.com/2008/01/26/tom-cruises-scarily-funny-doppelganger/</link>
		<comments>http://bobhayesonline.com/2008/01/26/tom-cruises-scarily-funny-doppelganger/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 15:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Hayes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hollywood]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bobhayes.net/2008/01/26/tom-cruises-scarily-funny-doppelganger/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is pretty hilarious, right here.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is <a href="http://fauxrealtho.com/2008/01/22/scary-parody/">pretty hilarious</a>, right here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bobhayesonline.com/2008/01/26/tom-cruises-scarily-funny-doppelganger/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Review of &#8220;Cloverfield&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://bobhayesonline.com/2008/01/19/a-review-of-cloverfield/</link>
		<comments>http://bobhayesonline.com/2008/01/19/a-review-of-cloverfield/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 17:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Hayes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blogosphere]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hollywood]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bobhayes.net/2008/01/19/a-review-of-cloverfield/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8230;over at the Speculist.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;over at the <a href="http://www.blog.speculist.com/archives/001619.html">Speculist</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bobhayesonline.com/2008/01/19/a-review-of-cloverfield/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>We Want Kirk!</title>
		<link>http://bobhayesonline.com/2007/12/10/we-want-kirk/</link>
		<comments>http://bobhayesonline.com/2007/12/10/we-want-kirk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 13:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Hayes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bobhayes.net/2007/12/10/we-want-kirk/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sign the petition.
[Homer Simpson voice]: do it!
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.wewantkirk.com/">Sign the petition</a>.</p>
<p>[Homer Simpson voice]: do it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bobhayesonline.com/2007/12/10/we-want-kirk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This Outrage Shall Not Be Born</title>
		<link>http://bobhayesonline.com/2007/10/26/hello-world/</link>
		<comments>http://bobhayesonline.com/2007/10/26/hello-world/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 04:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Bob Hayes</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hollywood]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Star Trek]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false"></guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There will be a new Star Trek movie next year, highlighting the adventures of the original series crew. Chris Pine is set to be the new Kirk, and Leonard Nimoy is slotted to play (the older) Spock &#8211; but apparently there was no room at the inn for William Shatner.
Nothing is yet written in stone. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There will be a new Star Trek movie next year, highlighting the adventures of the original series crew. Chris Pine is set to be the <a href="http://trekmovie.com/2007/10/17/chris-pine-is-kirkdeal-signed-today/">new Kirk</a>, and Leonard Nimoy is slotted to play (the older) Spock &#8211; but apparently there was <a href="http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=D8SH4P2O0&amp;show_article=1">no room at the inn for William Shatner</a>.</p>
<p>Nothing is yet written in stone. <a href="http://trekmovie.com/2007/10/26/shatner-not-putting-me-in-is-not-wise/">There is still time to reverse this terrible error</a>.</p>
<p>My wife, who is a genius, hypothesizes that Shatner wanted too much money. I could see that happening; his career is doing really well, he has become a genuine cultural icon, and his importance to the Trek franchise, while possible of overstatement, is enormous. He may have thought he was being low-balled.</p>
<p>Or maybe the creators of the film are just being Hollywood idiots. That wouldn&#8217;t be a novel explanation, but it has a certain historical plausibility. Whatever the scenario, I hope this is fixed. A re-imagining of the old series has the potential to be fantastic &#8211; and it wouldn&#8217;t be the same without the original, accept-no-imitation, 100% James Tiberius Kirk.</p>
<p>Oh, and yeah, this is my first post here at the new digs, but never mind that. Take to the streets and demand this outrage be corrected!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bobhayesonline.com/2007/10/26/hello-world/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

